TL;DR
- 40+ companies scored across Technology, E-commerce, Automotive, Financial Services, Healthcare, Media, and Hospitality
- Top performers share patterns: ecosystem lock-in, employee empowerment, radical transparency, continuous iteration, obsessive detractor follow-up
- Digital health companies (Hinge Health: 87, TytoCare: 83) now outperform traditional healthcare leaders
- Recovery stories prove improvement is possible: Charles Schwab went from -35 to 52 over 22 years
- Cultural scoring bias matters: same experience scores 20+ points lower in Europe vs. North America
- For strategies to improve your own score, see our guide on how to improve NPS
Tesla scores 78. Walmart's web experience scores -35. Both are Fortune 100 companies, yet there's a 113-point gap between them. The difference isn't about industry, size, or budget. It's about how they handle the customer experience gap between promise and execution.
You know your own Net Promoter Score, but do you know what it means in context? Is 45 good? Depends. For telecom, it's exceptional. For B2B SaaS, it's below average. For digital health, it wouldn't make the top 10.
Since Fred Reichheld, Bain & Company, and Satmetrix Systems introduced the Net Promoter System in 2003, company NPS scores have become the standard way to measure customer loyalty. This directory shows you what drives top company scores, what separates leaders from laggards, and what patterns show up across industries.
Why Company-Level NPS Scores Matter More Than Industry Averages?
Company-level scores tell you what's actually possible in your market. When you see Apple at 60-72 and Microsoft at 45-55, you're not just seeing numbers — you're seeing how brand loyalty, ecosystem stickiness, and customer experience compound over time.
Industry averages give you directional context. Company scores show you the ceiling. If you're a B2B SaaS company scoring 42, knowing the industry average is 36 matters less than knowing Nutanix hit 92. That 50-point gap tells you what's achievable with the right CX strategy.
Looking for industry benchmarks instead? Our NPS benchmarks by industry guide covers average scores and what's typical in your sector. This directory focuses on individual company scores, what drives them, and what you can learn from market leaders.
Scores vary by source because different research firms measure different things. CustomerGauge surveys enterprise B2B relationships. Retently tracks transactional feedback. NPSpack focuses on SaaS. ACSI (American Customer Satisfaction Index) measures consumer-facing industries. Company reports reflect their own internal data.
The range you see for companies like Tesla (70-78) or Netflix (50-68) reflects this reality. Different sources measure different touchpoints at different moments in the customer journey. We've consolidated the most reliable 2025-2026 data with sources and methodology notes for each score.
New to NPS? Start with what Net Promoter Score is and how it works, or use our free NPS calculator to compute your score.
1. NPS Scores for Companies in Technology & SaaS
This is where the highest NPS scores live. B2B SaaS companies that build integrated ecosystems or serve specific niches well consistently outperform generalist competitors.
| Company | NPS Score | Year | Source | Market Position |
| Nutanix | 92 | 2025 | NPSpack, Userpilot | Highest in B2B SaaS |
| Canva | 77 | 2025 | NPSpack | Top B2C SaaS |
| GitHub | 73 | 2025 | NPSpack, ChurnWard | Developer platform leader |
| Apple | 60-72 | 2025-2026 | Multiple | iPhone scores highest |
| HubSpot | 61 | 2025 | NPSpack, ChurnWard | Marketing automation |
| Zoom | 62-72 | 2025 | NPSpack, Userpilot | Video conferencing |
| Salesforce | 60-66 | 2025-2026 | Various | Range across segments |
| Slack | 55-58 | 2025 | CustomerGauge, NPSpack | Team collaboration |
| Microsoft | 45-55 | 2025-2026 | NPSpack | Ranges across products |
| 50-60 | 2025-2026 | Various | Search/Gmail higher |
What drives these scores?
-
Nutanix's 92 isn't luck. The enterprise cloud platform runs a customer success model that catches issues before escalation. Their NPS survey ties to account health scoring, and feedback flows directly to product teams. For more on how to measure NPS in SaaS, see our dedicated guide.
-
Apple's ecosystem creates loyalty that survives individual product frustrations. Once you're invested in iMessage, AirDrop, and your app history, switching to Android means losing all of it. The switching cost amplifies loyalty.
-
Only 3% of SaaS companies score above 70. For complete B2B and B2C SaaS benchmarks, see our industry guide.
2. NPS Scores for Companies in E-Commerce & Retail
Retail scores reflect how well companies balance price, convenience, and service. The 40-point gap between Costco (70-80) and Walmart's web experience (-35) tells you everything about what customers value.
| Company | NPS Score | Year | Source | Market Position |
| Costco | 70-80 | 2025-2026 | Multiple | Leader in retail loyalty |
| Amazon | 60-73 | 2025-2026 | Multiple | 67 for web experience |
| Nordstrom | 55-65 | 2025-2026 | Industry estimates | Premium retail |
| Target | ~40 | 2025-2026 | Comparably | 3rd among major retailers |
| Walmart | 30-45, -35 (web) | 2025-2026 | QuestionPro, MeasuringU | Wide variance by channel |
Costco's model works because of radical simplicity. "Just take it back" is their return policy. No questions, no friction, no receipt required for most items. Transparent pricing with limited markups. Employee satisfaction flows to customer service. Membership creates commitment before you buy your first item.
Amazon's 60-73 range reflects channel differences. The web experience scores 67. Overall platform loyalty sits around 60-73 depending on Prime membership status. Once you're used to free two-day shipping, going back feels painful. The switching cost keeps customers locked in.
3. Automotive & Transportation: Mission-Driven Loyalty vs. Legacy Friction
This sector shows the widest scoring gaps. Tesla's mission-driven approach versus traditional automotive's dealer friction creates a 50+ point difference at the top and bottom of the industry.
| Company | NPS Score | Year | Source | Market Position |
| Tesla | 70-78 | 2025-2026 | Multiple | Industry leader |
| Toyota | 50-60, 67 | 2025 | QuestionPro, Various | 67 from Q1 2025 study |
| Porsche | 58.2 | 2025 | J.D. Power | Premium segment |
| Honda | 57 | 2025 | QuestionPro | Strong loyalty engine |
| BMW | 40-50, 54 | 2025-2026 | Multiple | Luxury segment |
| Ford | 32 | 2025 | QuestionPro | 66.6% brand loyalty |
| Nissan | 19 | 2025 | QuestionPro | CX gaps |
Tesla's 70-78 reflects mission-driven loyalty. Product experience scores high despite service challenges. The direct sales model eliminates dealer friction. And the mission — sustainability, electric future — creates emotional connection that traditional automotive can't replicate.
Toyota's 81% promoter rate (from the 67 NPS) signals consistent quality delivery. After-sales service is the critical driver in automotive. Great car plus terrible dealership experience equals lower NPS.
For automotive industry benchmarks and scoring trends, see our complete guide.
4. Financial Services & Banking: Where Trust Compounds Over Time
Financial services shows the widest performance spread of any industry we track. Princeton Mortgage's 98 versus large bank scores in the teens reflects the difference between relationship-first versus transaction-first business models.
| Company | NPS Score | Year | Source | Market Position |
| Princeton Mortgage | 98 | 2023 | Company reports | Highest documented score |
| Metro Bank | 82 | 2025 | Industry benchmarks | High street bank leader |
| USAA | 75-82 | 2025-2026 | Multiple | Consistently highest in banking |
| Fidelity | 81-82 | 2026 | ACSI 2026 | Investment firms leader |
| Vanguard | 55-79 | 2025-2026 | Various | Online investment platforms |
| Charles Schwab | 52, 79 | 2025-2026 | Multiple | Recovered from -35 in 2003 |
| Chase | 76-77 | 2026 | ACSI 2026 | National bank/investment |
| Ameriprise Financial | 78 | 2026 | ACSI 2026 | Wealth management |
| Citigroup | 18 | 2025 | CustomerGauge | Post-2008 recovery |
USAA's 75-82 is the outlier. The military-focused member model creates shared identity. Front-line employees have authority to resolve issues without escalation. Proactive outreach programs target detractors. 24/7 availability matches military lifestyle. Niche focus plus employee empowerment beats scale.
Charles Schwab's recovery from -35 to 52 (2003-2025) is one of the best-documented turnaround stories in NPS history. They implemented the Net Promoter System in 2004, made "through the client's eyes" an operational filter, introduced lowest commissions (2017), and backed a "satisfaction guaranteed" promise with actual refunds. 22 years of consistent focus.
For financial services industry benchmarks, including banking, credit unions, and investment firms, see our complete guide. For sector-specific tools, see NPS tools for banking.
5. Healthcare: Digital Health Disrupts Traditional Care Models
Traditional hospital systems like Mayo Clinic and Cleveland Clinic are known for excellent care and score 60-70. But the highest 2025-2026 scores come from digital health companies transforming how care is delivered.
| Company | NPS Score | Year | Source | Category | Market Position |
| Hinge Health | 87 | 2025 | IPO documents | Digital therapeutics | Virtual MSK care |
| TytoCare | 83 | Nov 2025 | Company press | Virtual care | Home Smart Clinic |
| Catapult Health | 81+ | Feb 2025 | Teladoc acquisition | Preventive care | VirtualCheckup |
| CVS Pharmacy | 80 | 2025 | CVS Business website | Retail pharmacy | Patient satisfaction |
| Oscar Health | 69, 87 (Spanish) | Q1 2024 | Company reports | Health insurance | Tech-forward insurer |
Hinge Health's 87 comes from serving 49% of Fortune 100 companies with virtual musculoskeletal care. 98% client retention. 95% automation of clinician hours for scale. The model eliminates traditional healthcare friction: wait times, scheduling headaches, in-person visits for issues that don't require them.
Why digital health scores higher:
- Tech-enabled convenience eliminates wait times
- Consumer-first design (built like SaaS products, not legacy systems)
- Outcome transparency visible to patients
- Modern expectations met (home, mobile, on-demand)
- Preventive focus catches issues early
For healthcare industry benchmarks, including hospitals, telehealth platforms, and insurers, see our complete guide. For patient satisfaction measurement strategies, see NPS in healthcare.
6. Media, Entertainment & Hospitality: Content Quality vs. Service Excellence
Streaming services face structural NPS challenges: intense competition, low switching costs, declining price tolerance. Hospitality benefits from emotional stakes that create memorable experiences worth recommending.
| Company/Industry | NPS Score | Year | Source | Market Position |
| Starbucks | 77 | 2025-2026 | SurveySensum | Consistent brand leader |
| Netflix | 50-68 | 2025-2026 | Multiple | Range reflects segments |
| Spotify | 45-60 | 2025-2026 | Industry estimates | Music streaming leader |
| Disney+ | 40-50 | 2025-2026 | Industry estimates | Bundle drives retention |
| Airbnb | High | 2025 | Industry studies | 150M users, score not disclosed |
Netflix's 50-68 range reflects real variation. The score declined from its peak as competition increased. When every platform has good shows, the differentiator becomes price, interface usability, and recommendation accuracy. Netflix's recommendation algorithm genuinely works, which keeps customers feeling like the platform understands their preferences.
For hospitality and entertainment industry benchmarks, see our complete guide. For hospitality-specific guidance, see our hotel NPS survey guide.
Industries with Structural NPS Challenges: Airlines, Telecom & Utilities
Some industries face structural challenges that keep NPS scores low across the board. High customer expectations, commoditized service, and limited differentiation create friction that even the best operators struggle to overcome.
| Company/Industry | NPS Score | Year | Market Position |
| Southwest Airlines | 71 | 2025 | Significantly higher than industry average |
| Airlines (Industry Avg) | 33-37 | 2025 | Most carriers below 30 |
| American Airlines | -8 | 2025 | Poor customer service |
| Telecommunications | 25-35 | 2025 | Service quality issues |
| Utilities & Government | 10-30 | 2025 | Monopolistic conditions |
| B2B Software (Many) | 0-10 | 2025 | Product complexity, learning curves |
Southwest Airlines' 71 is more than double the industry average. Their friendly culture, transparent pricing (no hidden fees), and free checked bags create loyalty in an industry known for nickel-and-diming passengers. When everyone else treats customers poorly by default, being decent becomes a competitive advantage.
American Airlines' -8 reflects the opposite: cost-cutting on customer service, lack of engagement with feedback, operational decisions prioritized over customer experience.
What Drives Top NPS Scores: 6 Patterns of Leaders
These aren't generic "focus on the customer" platitudes. They're data-backed patterns observed across 40+ scored companies. Here are the patterns that can be found in the companies that score the highest NPS.
Pattern 1: Ecosystem Stickiness
Apple iOS. Amazon Prime bundling. High switching costs amplify loyalty. Once customers invest time, money, data, and integrations, they become less price-sensitive and more tolerant of individual product frustrations. The ecosystem keeps them in even when a single feature disappoints.
Pattern 2: Employee Empowerment
USAA: front-line authority without escalation. Costco: "just take it back" return policy executed by any employee. Ritz-Carlton: $2,000 per employee discretionary budget to solve customer problems without asking permission. Empowered employees resolve issues faster, creating happier customers who become promoters.
Pattern 3: Radical Transparency
Tesla's direct sales model eliminates dealer markup games. Costco's transparent pricing structure. No hidden fees, no surprise charges, no fine print designed to confuse. Transparency reduces friction and builds trust.
Pattern 4: Continuous Product Iteration
Netflix refines content algorithms based on viewing behavior. Slack releases features weekly based on user feedback. GitHub runs a developer-first roadmap. Leaders treat customer feedback as product input, not just a satisfaction metric to report quarterly.
Pattern 5: Obsessive Detractor Follow-Up
Apple's 24-hour callback commitment. USAA's proactive outreach programs. Detractors who receive follow-up and see their issue resolved often become more loyal than customers who never had an issue. That only works if you actually follow up and fix the problem.
Pattern 6: Activating Promoters for Growth
Top NPS companies don't just measure satisfaction — they turn promoters into advocates. Apple and Tesla built significant market share through word of mouth from loyal customers who became brand advocates.
Companies That Recovered from Low NPS: Proof That Improvement Is Possible
Improvement isn't theoretical. These documented cases of certain companies show what recovery looks like and how long it takes.
a. Charles Schwab: -35 → 52 (2003-2025)
Timeframe: 22 years of consistent improvement.
What changed: Implemented Net Promoter System in 2004. Employee engagement tied to compensation. "Through the client's eyes" became an operational filter for every decision. Lowest commissions strategy (2017). "Satisfaction guaranteed" backed by actual refunds.
The lesson: Long-term commitment works. Most companies give up after three years when the score hasn't moved 20 points. Schwab stuck with it for two decades.
b. Domino's Pizza: Complete Turnaround
What changed: Complete menu overhaul after publicly acknowledging quality issues. Transparency campaign where they literally said "We know we weren't good. Here's what we changed." Digital innovation focus with ordering apps and pizza tracker.
The lesson: Radical honesty plus product fix. Admitting the problem before announcing the solution builds credibility.
c. Zip Water UK: +2 → +73 (3 years)
What changed: One of the fastest documented recoveries. CX program overhaul included closing the loop on every detractor response within 48 hours.
The lesson: Fast improvement is possible with focused effort and sufficient resources.
How to Use Company NPS Scores for Benchmarking?
Company-level scores are useful reference points. Here's how to use them correctly.
-
Compare within your sector, not across. SaaS companies benchmarking against healthcare makes no sense. Structural differences create variance that has nothing to do with your CX quality. Use the sector tables above as reference points within your industry. For detailed industry averages and benchmarking methodology, see our dedicated guide.
-
Account for survey methodology differences. Relational NPS (quarterly check-ins measuring overall relationship) versus transactional NPS (post-interaction satisfaction) produce different scores even for the same company. Email versus SMS versus in-app survey channels affect response rates and who responds.
-
Cultural scoring bias is real. If you serve global customers, regional variance is expected. The same customer experience can score 15-20 points lower in Europe versus North America due to cultural scoring tendencies, not actual satisfaction differences.
-
Use as directional inspiration, not fixed targets. Apple's 72 isn't achievable for every company. The ecosystem advantage is structural, not operational. Focus on improvement trajectory — are you moving up? Understanding the difference between relative NPS and absolute NPS matters.
-
Track your own trend line. Quarter-over-quarter improvement matters more than beating Amazon. Consistent 2-3 point annual gains compound over time. Charles Schwab's 22-year journey proves slow and steady wins.
Understanding Score Variations Across Sources
Score variance reflects methodology differences, not measurement error. Here's what constitutes the score variance factors:
- Survey methodology (relationship vs. transactional NPS)
- Customer segment (enterprise vs. SMB, B2B vs. B2C)
- Measurement channel (in-app vs. email vs. post-purchase)
- Geographic mix (cultural scoring differences)
- Timing (seasonal variations, market conditions)
- Source differences (research firms, sample sizes, methods)
For instance, Tesla's 70-97 range reflects different sources measuring different segments. Model S owners versus Model 3 owners. Product experience scores high, service experience lower. Some sources measure overall brand sentiment, others measure specific touchpoints.
Hence, don't obsess over exact numbers. Focus on directional trends. When citing company scores internally, note the source and methodology.
Conclusion
Knowing top company NPS scores gives you context — whether you're in the right league, falling behind, or quietly outperforming a market that doesn't know it yet. But the companies that consistently sit above industry standards don't get there by watching the scoreboard.
They get there by using NPS feedback to make decisions, closing the loop with NPS detractors before they churn, and treating every survey response as an input to real action. They understand that promoters drive growth, NPS passives are the swing segment, and detractors need rapid follow-up.
Your industry average is public knowledge. What you do about the gap between that number and yours, that's what differentiates you from your competitors!
Sources:
- CustomerGauge. B2B NPS & CX Benchmarks Report. 2025. 27+ bank benchmarks, verified data.
- Retently. What is a Good Net Promoter Score? (2025 NPS Benchmark). March 30, 2025. 150K+ organizations, 5.4M responses. Primary B2B and B2C industry benchmark data.
- NPSpack. 500+ SaaS companies analyzed. 2025. B2B and B2C SaaS benchmark data.
- ACSI (American Customer Satisfaction Index). Finance Study 2026. 14,210 surveys, Jan-Dec 2025. Banking and financial services benchmarks.
- Sybill. NPS Scores of Companies: 2026 Benchmarks. January 2026. Cross-industry benchmark data.
- QuestionPro. NPS Benchmarks. Q1 2025 CX Benchmark. 1,000+ participant studies, automotive and retail data.
- J.D. Power. Automotive Brand Loyalty Study 2025. Premium automotive segment data.
- SurveySensum. Multi-industry benchmarks. 2025-2026. Hospitality and consumer services data.
- Comparably. Employee plus customer data platform. 2025-2026. Retail benchmark data.
- Userpilot. 229 B2B SaaS companies. 2025. SaaS-specific benchmarks.
- ChurnWard. B2B SaaS focus, methodology-verified. 2025. Enterprise software benchmarks.
- MeasuringU. UX and NPS retail benchmarks. 2025-2026. E-commerce data.
- Company Reports. IPO documents, earnings releases, press releases. Hinge Health, TytoCare, Catapult Health, Oscar Health, CVS.
- Bain & Company. Introducing the Net Promoter System. Original NPS research and growth correlation studies.
- CX Lead. CX professional survey data. 2025. Industry-specific benchmarks.